检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第175医院(厦门大学附属东南医院)急诊科,福建漳州363000
出 处:《临床军医杂志》2011年第5期892-893,共2页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
摘 要:目的探讨纳洛酮联合依达拉奉治疗急性重型颅脑损伤的疗效。方法将168例急性重型颅脑损伤的患者随机分为两组,纳洛酮联合依达拉奉治疗组86例,在常规治疗的基础上纳洛酮3 mg加至生理盐水250 ml中静脉滴注,1次/d,连用14 d,同时加用依达拉奉30mg用生理盐水100 ml静脉滴注,1次/d,连用14 d。对照组82例,给予常规治疗,记录两组患者治疗前及治疗后14 d的脑水肿程度及格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)。结果两组患者治疗前后脑水肿程度及GCS评分间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论纳洛酮联合依达拉奉治疗急性重型颅脑损伤的患者较常规治疗方法,疗效更好。Objective To analyze the effect of Naloxone combined with Edaravone in treatment of acute severe brain injury. Methods The 168 patients with acute severe brain injury were randomly divided into two groups.On the basis of conventional therapy,86 cases in Naloxone combined with Edaravone treatment group were given Naloxone 3mg in 250ml of normal saline by intravenous infusion 1/d for 14d continuously and Edaravone 30mg was added to 100ml of normal saline by intravenous infusion 1/d for 14d continuously.82 patients in control group were given conventional treatment.The level of brain edema in patients and Glasgow coma scale(GCS) were recorded before and 14d after treatment. Results The difference of the level of brain edema and GCS score between two groups before and after treatment had statistical significance(P0.05). Conclusion Compare with conventional treatment methods,Naloxone combined with Edaravone has better efficacy for acute severe brain injury
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.106.93