检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《管理科学学报》2011年第10期77-84,共8页Journal of Management Sciences in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70772077);国家自然科学基金重点项目(70832005)
摘 要:以单供应商-单制造商-多个第三方物流企业组成的供应物流外包系统为对象进行研究,对直接外包模式和领导物流合作伙伴(LLP)模式下三方企业的利益分配问题进行讨论.建立多委托人-多代理人的成本整合模型并求解,比较分析了在直接外包模式与LLP模式下三方企业的成本分摊与利益分配情况.研究结果揭示:1)LLP模式与直接外包模式相比制造商的总收益增加,该部分收益增加来自于专业化分工;2)若LLP的保留效用不变,LLP专业化分工获得的额外收益全部被制造商从报酬支付中剥夺,并由制造商和供应商分享;3)LLP适当调整保留效用后,获得的报酬与直接外包方式一致,并与制造商共同分享额外收益.This paper investigates the allocation mechanisms in inbound logistics system consisting of single supplier,single manufacturer and multiple third party logistics providers.The aim is to compare profit sharing and cost allocation in two outsourcing modes,direct outsourcing and lead logistics partner(LLP).Multi-principal and multi-agent models are applied to investigate the system and solution procedures are proposed.Comparing the profit of all parties,results reveal that the manufacturer can obtain more profits in LLP mode than direct outsourcing,and the extra profits are generated from specialized management of LLP.When LLP's reserved utility is the same with direct sourcing mode,the extra profits contributed by LLP are deprived and allocated between the manufacturer and the supplier.When LLP increases its reserved utility,it can share the extra profits with the manufacturer,and its income is the same with direct outsourcing mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69