论茅盾文学奖的历史叙事及其批判  

On Historical Narration and Its Criticism of Mao Dun Literature Awards

作　　者：任美衡[1] 

机构地区：[1]衡阳师范学院中文系,湖南衡阳421008

出　　处：《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期151-154,共4页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目"近三十年长篇小说审美经验反思"(09YJC751023);湖南省教育厅社会科学基金项目"茅盾文学奖研究"(09B018)

摘　　要：在茅盾文学奖中,历史题材的作品显示出了特别的优势,不但数量多,而且质量高,基本上囊括了新时期以来经典的历史小说。由于历史题材拉开了与现实的距离,祛除了书写的诸多顾忌,给作家创造了至为宽松的"外部"环境,加之思想的解放,尤其是西方各种各样的历史主义潮流启开了国人的心智,由此扩大了茅盾文学奖的审美视界,也丰富了它的历史诗学并通过时间的进步性、多元的历史观、历史的理性化与辩证化、历史的能指性等多个方面呈现出来。这种历史诗学及其叙事既使茅盾文学奖赢得了鲜明的个性,但也产生了一些争议,值得特别关注。In Mao Dun Literature Awards,the historical works show their special advantages with large quantity and high quality,which basically includes all classic historical novels since the new period.The historical subject pulls away a certain distance with reality,removes many scruples of writing,and provides a relatively relaxed external environment to authors.Additionally,due to the thought liberation,especially Chinese people＇s minds were opened by Western various historical tides,it the aesthetic horizons of Mao Dun Literature Awards have been greatly expanded,and its poetics of history have been enriched and presented through time advancement,pluralistic conception of history,historical rationalization and dialecticalizatio,and historical significant.Such historical poetics and narration wins outstanding individuality for Mao Dun Literature Awards,meanwhile it also produces some controversies,which is worth paying attention to.

关 键 词：茅盾文学奖 历史观 叙事批判 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]