检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋向杰[1]
机构地区:[1]西南林业大学,昆明650224
出 处:《红河学院学报》2011年第3期90-92,共3页Journal of Honghe University
摘 要:由于法律解释多元化等因素的存在,我国的法律解释制度备受质疑。因此,如何对我国法律解释体系进行重构,是法学界一直争论不休的话题。笔者认为,在各种法律解释观中,德沃金法律解释观是最适合我国法律解释体系重构的理论。在德沃金法律解释观的视野下,我国的法律解释体系的重构应该以取消法律解释主体多元化、完善审判解释程序两个层面为切入点。Due to the factors such as diversity of legal interpretation,China’s system of legal interpretation has been questioned.Therefore,how to reconstruct China’s system of legal interpretation has always been the disputable topics in the field of law science.The author believes that in various legal interpretation perspectives,Dworkin's legal interpretation perspective is the most suitable theory for the reconstruction of China’s system of legal interpretation.In Dworkin's legal interpretation perspective,China’s system of legal interpretation reconstruction should put two aspects-cancelling subject diversification of the legal interpretation,perfecting trial interpretation procedures as entry points.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.107.84