检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李金祥[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院
出 处:《欧洲研究》2011年第5期88-102,7,共15页Chinese Journal of European Studies
摘 要:联合国制裁恐怖主义机制的功能包括约束作用、示范作用、规范作用和服务作用。这些功能推动了恐怖主义制裁的国际合作。由于制裁机制的存在,国际社会形成了一个治理恐怖主义的新模式。然而,成员国的不合作导致上述功能存在以下缺陷:机制的约束作用较弱,示范作用较窄,规范作用有限,服务质量不高。成员国不合作的根源在于制裁机制中的权力分配失衡、国际社会中相互依赖的变化、制裁机制本身的不健全和不透明。要提升未来成员国在国际反恐中的合作和治理效果,各主要国家和联合国应当推动制裁机制的完善,以赢得更广泛的国际合作。The roles of UN sanction regimes against terrorism include constraining,exemplary,normative and service ones,which have helped to enhance international cooperation in sanctioning terrorism.Therefore,a new paradigm of governance is emerging in international society.Nonetheless,some shortcomings still exist in these regimes.For example,the constraint effect of the regimes is too weak,the exemplary role only limited to a few states and regions,the scope of the normative role rather narrow and the quality of service offered very poor.All of these can be attributed to the reluctance of the member states to cooperate,which is in turn caused by the asymmetric distribution of power in the regimes,the transformation of interdependence and the lack of soundness and transparence of the regimes.The UN itself and its major member states should try to enhance cooperation and improve the effectiveness of the regimes in fighting terrorism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3