著作权侵权赔偿模式的弊端与修正——与一般侵权案件的对比分析  

Defect and Perfection of Compensation Model in Copyright Infringement:Based on Comparison with General Infringement Cases

作　　者：储陈城[1] 孙海涛[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学,山东济南250100 [2]河海大学,江苏南京210098 [3]埃默里大学,美国亚特兰大30022

出　　处：《广播电视大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第3期29-34,共6页Journal of Radio & TV University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

摘　　要：从举证责任角度修改《著作权法》基于损失计算法和收益计算法的赔偿模式缺乏可操作性,我国司法实践中最常见的著作权赔偿计算模式是法官在50万元以下进行自由裁量。鉴于著作权有别与其他有体物侵权方式的特殊性,应引入着重于民事责任预防功能的惩罚性赔偿模式以最大程度保护著作权,著作权法可借鉴专利法的相关做法。It is not practical that amending the compensation model in the Copyright Law based on damages and profits from the point of burden of proof,in practice the judge make discretionary awards within 500,000 Yuan.According to the particularity of infringement mode copyright distinguished from other tangible properties,to provide maximum protection for copyright punitive damages system should be introduced,stressing on prevention function of civil liability.Thus some associated methods from the Patent Law can be used reference for the Copyright Law.

关 键 词：著作权侵权 赔偿模式 借鉴 专利权法 惩罚性赔偿模式 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]