检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐进春[1] 黎玮[1] 张艳平[1] 郭垣衫[1] 路宝赛[1]
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第二医院泌尿外科,河北石家庄050000
出 处:《中国医药导报》2011年第31期126-127,共2页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的:观察中药内服配合坐浴综合治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法:将我院门诊收治的126例慢性前列腺炎患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各63例。治疗组采用中药内服配合坐浴治疗,对照组采用盐酸左氧氟沙星片治疗,比较两组的治疗效果。结果:治疗组总有效率为90.5%,对照组总有效率为82.5%,治疗组疗效优于对照组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后中医症候积分较本组治疗前均降低(P<0.05);治疗后,治疗组中医症候积分低于对照组,两组中医症候积分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中药内服配合坐浴治疗慢性前列腺炎临床疗效确切,能有效消除症状,且无毒副作用,值得临床推广。Objective: To observe the clinical effect of Chinese herbs combined with sitz bath in the treatment of chronic prostatitis. Methods: 126 patients with chronic prostatitis were treated in our hospital and randomly divided into treatment group and control group, each group had 63 cases. Treatment group were given Chinese herbs oral treatment combined with sitz bath. The control group were treated with Levofloxacin Tablets. The therapeutic effect of two groups were compared. Results: The total effective rate of the treatment group was 90.5%, the total efficiency of control group was 82.5%, efficacy of the treatment group was better than that of the control group, there was significant difference between two groups (P〈0.05). TCM symptom scores of two groups after treatment were lower than the before treatment (P〈0.05); the TCM syndrome scores of treatment group were lower than that in the control group after treatment, there was significant difference between two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Chinese herbs treatment combined with sitz bath in the treatment of chronic prostatitis is effective, it can effectively eliminate the symptoms and toxic side effects, and is worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.40.152