关于高校学费问题的实证分析  

An Empirical Analysis of Influencing Factors of University Tuition

作　　者：晏成步 

机构地区：[1]夏门大学教育研究院,厦门361005

出　　处：《教育发展研究》2011年第19期8-13,共6页Research in Educational Development

基　　金：厦门大学基础创新科研基金(研究生项目)“大学学费发展史研究”(201122G006)的部分成果

摘　　要：目前,我国公办高校和民办高校学费采用两种不同的定价方式,公办高校执行成本补偿,根据学生培养成本来合理分担比例,民办高校实行全成本定价。不同类型的高校提供了不同形态的教育服务,相同类型高校提供的教育服务质量不同,它们的学费水平存在显著差异;与民办高校相比,公办高校的教育服务质量与学费水平"倒挂"。在公办高校系统内部,专业教育学费水平差异不显著,价格信号作用不明显,不利于学校之间的公平竞争,也不利于高校专业和教育结构的调整。在社会主义市场经济与高等教育大众化的双重选择下,政府应该放松管制,让公办学校学费进行自主定价,使公办高校学费定价方式逐步从政府主导向市场主导转变。At present, China^s public and private colleges adopt two different price forms, the public institution execution costs of compensation, which is according to student training costs in reasonable proportion of all, but the private need the full-cost price. Different types of institutions of higher education have provided different services, or the same type has different quality services, which causes the significant difference of tuition level; furthermore, there is a ＂swing＂ level between the education service quality and tuition level of public schools compared with private schools. In the system of public institutions of higher education, the level of tuition fees has no notable difference, and the signal of it is not obvious, which is not useful for the equal competition among schools and the adjustment of specialties and education structure of university. With the dual choices of socialist market economy and higher education generalization, government should relax the governance and let public schools carry out independent pricing, and this way gradually changes from the government orientation to market orientation.

关 键 词：学费 成本分担 教育成本 高等教育服务 

分 类 号：G647.5[文化科学—高等教育学]