检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅医院超声影像科,长沙市410008
出 处:《中国超声医学杂志》2011年第10期882-884,共3页Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
基 金:湖南省卫生厅课题资助项目(No.B2009010)
摘 要:目的探讨超声弹性成像对浅表软组织良恶性肿块的鉴别诊断价值。方法应用超声弹性成像技术对48例患者共67个浅表软组织肿块进行检查,对弹性图进行分析并分级,将弹性图分级结果与手术病理结果作对比。结果浅表软组织良性肿块的弹性分级以0~Ⅱ级多见,而恶性肿块的弹性分级以Ⅲ~Ⅳ级多见,良恶性肿块之间弹性分级的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以Ⅲ级作为鉴别浅表软组织良恶性肿块的诊断界点,超声弹性成像鉴别诊断浅表软组织良恶性肿块的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为85.71%、86.96%和86.57%。结论超声弹性成像为鉴别诊断浅表软组织良恶性肿块提供了一个新的方法,有助于浅表软组织肿块良恶性的鉴别。Objective To evaluate the value of ultrasonic elastography in differentiating benign and malignant su- perficial soft tissue tumors. Methods Forty-eight patients with 67 superficial soft tissue tumors were examined by ul trasonic elastography. The elastograms were analyzed and classified. The results of elasticity grades were compared with the pathology. Results Most of the elasticity grades in benign superficial soft tissue tumors covered grade 0 toⅡ , whereas most of the elasticity grades in malignant tumors covered grade Ⅲ to IV. The elasticity grades were statisti- cally different between benign and malignant tumors(P〈0.05). If the cut-off value of the elasticity grades was equal or more than grade Ⅲ , the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasonic elastography in differentiating superficial soft tissue tumors was 85.71 %, 86.96 %, 86.57 %, respectively. Conclusions Ultrasonic elastography is a new valu- able ultrasonography method in differentiating benign and malignant superficial soft tissue tumors.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28