Beck绝望量表在农村自杀死亡研究中的信效度  

Reliability and validity of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in rural suicide study

作　　者：刘慧[1] 贾存显[1,2] 徐爱强[3] 邱惠敏[4] 路长飞[1] 王琳琳[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学研究所,济南250012 [2]山东大学经济学院博士后流动站,济南250100 [3]山东省疾病预防控制中心,济南250014 [4]山东省精神卫生中心,济南250014

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2011年第11期867-871,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基　　金：山东省博士后创新项目(200703091);国家自然科学基金(30972527)

摘　　要：目的:检验Beck绝望量表中文版在农村自杀死亡研究中的信度和效度。方法:利用山东省疾病监测点上获得198例农村自杀死亡者和201例正常对照者,用Beck绝望量表(BHS)进行测量,用特质焦虑量表(TAI)为效标。结果:自杀死亡组和正常对照组BHS的Cronbachα系数分别为0.92和0.86。BHS和TAI总分呈正相关(r=0.73,P<0.001)。按照自杀死亡组和正常对照组进行探索性因子分析,分别提取4个和5个公因子,提取的公因子个数与原量表设计者的假设不一致。结论:Beck绝望量表在农村自杀研究中具有较好的信度和效标效度,但结构效度有待完善。Objective： To test the reliability and validity of the Beck Hopelessness Scale （BHS） in rural suicides. Methods： Totally 198 rural suicides happened from September 1,2008 to August 31,2009 and 201 controls were collected from 25 towns of 3 counties from disease surveillance points in Shandong Province. The Beck Hopelessness Scale （BHS） was used to test hopelessness, with the Trait Anxiety Inventory （TAI） as the criterion, Results： The Cronbach a of BHS in suicides and controls were 0. 92 and 0. 86, respectively. Criterion validity analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between the scores of BHS and TAI （r =0. 73, P 〈0. 001）. Exploratory factor analyses showed 4 factors in suicides and 5 factors in controls were yielded, which were different from the hypothesis of the scale＇s original designer. Conclusion： The Beck Hopelessness Scale （BHS） has good reliability and criterion validity, however, construct validity needs to be improved.

关 键 词：Beck绝望量表 信度 效度 自杀 农村 

分 类 号：C913.9[经济管理]