《中国音韵学研究》讹夺举例  

Case Study of Errors and Omissions in A Study of Chinese Phonology

作　　者：丁治民[1] 杜冬梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]温州大学人文学院,浙江温州325035

出　　处：《温州大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期57-63,共7页Journal of Wenzhou University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(05BYY053);教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目(09JHQ022)

摘　　要：《中国音韵学研究》是研究汉语言文字学的重要经典著作之一,它的出版标志着现代音韵学的诞生。但"古音字类表"存在的一些讹夺等现象尚未引起前修时贤的关注。现参照《康熙字典》、《广韵》等辞书,分类列举"古音字类表"的疏漏现象,并以声母表和韵母表中韵字对应的情况稍加说明。The publication of A Study of Chinese Phonology,one of the classics in the field of Chinese philology,marked the beginning of modern Chinese phonology.But,in the book,the errors and omissions in ＂the Classification Table of Ancient Sounds＂ have not drawn attention of previous scholars.Based on such dictionaries as Kangxi Dictionary and Guang Yun,such errors and omissions were classified.Furthermore,the classifications were illustrated by means of the correspondent rhyming words between the Consonant Table and the Vowel Table in the book.

关 键 词：高本汉 《中国音韵学研究》 声母表 韵母表 讹夺 

分 类 号：H113[语言文字—汉语]