检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘洋[1]
机构地区:[1]新乡医学院心理学系,453003
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2011年第10期1250-1251,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:河南省重点教改课题(编号:2009SJGLX210);河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(编号:2010-QN-122)
摘 要:目的探讨大学生主观幸福感现状与其自我效能感水平的关系。方法采用中国人幸福感量表和自我效能感量表对922名大学生主观幸福感现状进行调查;分析大学生自我效能感水平对其主观幸福感状况的影响。结果 922名大学生主观幸福感得分最高分为125分,最低分为31分,平均(61.7±11.3)分。自我效能感及2个维度对主观幸福感的影响显著(F=140.229,P<0.001);决定系数R2=0.254。自我效能感对大学生主观幸福感的预测模型能够解释其25.4%的变异量。结论大学生主观幸福感状况良好,但程度不强,且存在较大个体差异;自我效能感对主观幸福感具有极其显著的正向预测力。Objective To explore the relationship between college students' subjective well-being and self-efficacy.Methods Used Chinese Happiness Scale and Self-efficacy Scale to 922 college students,analyzed the influence of college students self-efficacy level on the status of subjective well-being.Results The highest score of 922 college students' subjective well-being was 125,the lowest was 31,the average score was(61.7±11.3).Self-efficacy and two factors had significant influences on subjective well-being(F=140.229,P0.001),the determination coefficient R2 was 0.254.The prediction model of self-efficacy on college students' subjective well-being can explain its 25.4% variance.Conclusion College students' subjective well-being is in good condition,but the degree is not strong,and there is a large individual difference,self-efficacy has extremely significant positive predictive power to the subjective well-being.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171