检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋磊[1]
出 处:《中外医学研究》2011年第32期15-17,共3页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的对糖尿病肾病患者不同临床疗法的疗效进行观察。方法将2008年1月~2010年12月收治的糖尿病肾病患者随机分为观察组与对照组,分别采用了西医疗法及中西医结合的治疗方式进行治疗,并对两种不同临床疗法的疗效进行了观察。结果经治疗后,观察组患者的24h尿蛋白、BUN、Scr值较对照组明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖值较对照组明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组42例中,显效18例,有效21例,无效3例,总有效率为92.86%;对照组42例中,显效14例,有效17例,无效11例,总有效率为73.81%。两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用中西医结合的治疗方式进行糖尿病肾病的治疗,具有较好的治疗效果,值得推广。Objective Observing the clinical efficacy of different treatment to patients with diabetic nephropathy(DN). Methods The diabetic patients who treated from January 2008 to December 2010 were randomly divided into control group and observation group. They were treated with Western medicine or Integrative medicine. Observing the clinical efficacy of different treatment. Results After treatment, the 24 - hour urine protein, BUN, Scr of the observation group were decreased significantly than the control group with statistical significance( P 〈 0. 05 ). The FPG and 2 hPG of the observed group were decreased significantly than the control group with statistical significance (P 〈 0.05 ). In the observation group, the total effective rate was 92. 86% ;In the control group, the total effective rate was 73.81% ;There was a significant difference between the two groups (P 〈0. 05). Conclusion The combination of Chinese and Western medicine treatment for diabetic nephropathy has a better therapeutic effect, it is worth promoting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3