检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志(上旬刊)》2011年第11期10-11,共2页Journal of Qilu Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨护理干预对膀胱癌(BC)患者焦虑、抑郁状态的影响。方法:采用Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)对46例BC患者护理干预前后的焦虑和抑郁状态进行调查分析并比较。结果:46例BC患者护理干预前SAS评分和SDS评分与国内常模比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);护理干预后患者焦虑、抑郁发生率及SAS评分、SDS评分均低于护理干预前(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论:BC患者存在明显的焦虑、抑郁状态,在临床治疗过程中给予积极护理干预可有效缓解其焦虑、抑郁情绪。Objective: To explore the effect of nursing intervention on anxiety and depression of the patients with bladder cancer. Methods : The Zung Self rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self - rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to analyzed and compare the status of anxiety and depression of 46 patients with bladder cancer before and after nursing intervention. Resuits : The differences in the comparison of the SAS scores and SDS scores of 46 patients with bladder cancer with the national norm were statistically significant before nursing intervention (P 〈 0.01); the incidence of anxiety and depression, the SAS scores and SDS scores were lower after nursing intervention than those before nursing intervention ( P 〈 0. 05, P 〈 0.01 ). Conclu- sion: The status of anxiety and depression were obvious in the patients with bladder cancer and the active nursing intervention during the treatment can effectively relieve their anxiety and depression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28