检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯贤亮[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学上海200433
出 处:《清史研究》2011年第4期76-90,114,共16页The Qing History Journal
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(09YJC770005);教育部人文社科研究基地重大项目(10JJDZONGHE025)阶段性成果
摘 要:太平天国战争后,江南地方政府面临着重建地方社会秩序、恢复经济生产等要务。但战后存在的社会危机感,以及民间随时可能发生的变乱,一直难以真正平复。本文考察了同治十年二月攻打广德州和建平县的所谓"教匪"反乱事件及江苏、浙江、安徽等省的协作平定行动。一般认为,在太平天国战争后,自中央到地方的垂直控制系统、地方的保甲体系以及府州县对于地方社会的掌控能力,有不同程度的削弱。可是从这个暴乱事件被平定的整个过程来看,这种认识是不太准确的。In the aftermath of the warfare with the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, local governments in the Jiangnan were confronted with essential tasks such as the reconstruction of social order and the recovery of economic production, but the sense of crisis and potential danger of turmoil in the postwar years made these tasks difficult. This paper explores the revolt by so-caued "jiaofei" (religious bandits) to attack Guangde department and Jianping county in March, 1865, and narrates the cooperative quelling actions by authorities of Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Anhui provinces. Although it is generally acknowledged that local social control was weakened to various degrees after the Taiping Rebellion, this vertical integrated system of control from the court to the local governments included the baojia system and provincial administrations at all levels. The view that local social control was weak, is perhaps incorrect given the successful suppression of this insurrection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.158.137