检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴月英[1]
出 处:《医学信息(下旬刊)》2011年第10期219-219,共1页Medical information
摘 要:目的:对急救护理路径在抢救急性心肌梗死患者的应用及临床效果进行分析探讨。方法:对2008年7月至2010年10月我院收治的急,R-心肌梗死患者进行回顾性分析,其中56例按急救护理路径实施抢救护理(观察组),62例按传统急诊护理流程进行护理(对照组),将两组进行比较分析。结果:观察组的进一出急诊时间、急诊一球囊扩张时间显著短于对照组,其院内心肌梗死复发率及病死率也显著比对照组低。结论:急救护理路径的实施可为急性心肌梗死患者赢得抢救时机,提高抢救的成功率。Objective: To observe and analyze treatment effect of the path of emergency care in emergency treatment of acute myocardial infarction and clinical application. Methods: From July 2008 to October 2010 in our hospital with acute myocardial infarction were retrospectively analyzed, of which 56 cases was implemented the path of emergency care ( observation group), 62 cases according to the traditional emergency care process in nursing ( control group), and the two groups were compared. Results: The observation group's time in emergency room, emergency - balloon time was significantly shorter than the control group, the recurrence rate of myocardial infarction and hospital mortality was significantly lower than the control group. Conclusion: The implementation of the path of emergency care for Acute Myocardial Infarction to win the rescue time and improve the success rate of rescue.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222