“当判则判”与“调判结合”——基于实务和操作层面的分析  

Judgment Combination to Mediation:An Analysis Based on the Practice

作　　者：范愉[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《法制与社会发展》2011年第6期49-56,共8页Law and Social Development

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金项目"民事纠纷的多元化解决机制研究"(10XNI033)

摘　　要："调解优先"的司法政策并不意味着"调解万能",其意义在于进一步促进调解在民事诉讼中的作用,并适应社会需求,在刑事、行政领域引进协商性因素。在民事诉讼中,"调解优先"符合私法自治原则,当事人处分权优先于公共利益考量,除法律明确禁止或限制的情形外,调解与协商和解是当事人的权利,也是法官的义务和责任,一般不能因公共利益而否定或限制调解。我国民事诉讼法的基本原则、制度制约、当事人处分权与法院职权的结合、相应的救济机制等,可以保证调解的正当性和效益。同时,诉讼调解必然以判决作为后盾,调判结合并非选择性安排,而是司法诉讼制度的必然。从实务角度出发,准确把握调判结合的原则和尺度、规避调解风险至关重要。从长远的发展而言,调判结合仍可进一步通过制度创新实现多元功能和价值。＂Mediation Priority＂ does not mean ＂mediation is everything＂,this judicial policy aims to promote the role of mediation in the civil procedure,and to meet the needs of society,introducing consultative factors in criminal and administrative procedures.In the civil procedure,＂Mediation Priority ＂is fit to private autonomy,the parties＇disciplinary right is concerned priority to the public interest consideration,unless the law specifically prohibits or limited circumstances,mediation,negotiation and settlement is the right of the parties,and also is the judge of the obligations and responsibilities,should not be negative or limiting because of public interest.The basic principle,system,the parties＇ right and the judge authority,and the remedies of China civil procedure law can guarantee the legitimacy and benefits of mediation.At the same time,litigation mediation must be supported by judgment,that is not selective,but is inevitable as the judicial proceedings system.In the practice,the most important is to accurately grasp the principle and scale of mediation and judgment,avoiding the risk in mediation.In the further development,the mediation combined with judgment can realize more functions and values through the system innovation.

关 键 词：诉讼调解 调解优先 调判结合 民事诉讼 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]