检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙洪坤[1]
出 处:《学术界》2011年第10期121-129,288,共9页Academics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(07BFX002)
摘 要:在现实语境下,程序正义在民众的思维和法律实践中均受到了不同程度的曲解,这在根本上与社会主义法治理念相悖。中国人情社会中的法制传统与程序正义本身构成一对矛盾,这个矛盾体的对立面存在着多种多样的表现形式。长期的人治传统使中国人习惯于听命与服从,从而束缚了自身的理性与自由。所以,为适应法治建构长远的需要,人们在程序观念上应做四维视角的转变:破除程序虚无主义,矫正程序工具主义,摒弃程序形式主义,强化程序理性主义。Under real context,procedural justice is misunderstood to different extents in the masses’ idea and legal practice.This is basically contrary to the idea of a socialist rule of law.In Chinese human relationship society,the legal system tradition and procedural justice compose a contradiction.There are all kinds of manifestations of antithesis in the contradiction.Long-term tradition of rule by people makes Chinese as a nation who have been used to taking and obeying orders.As a result,their reason and freedom are restrained.Therefore,in order to fit the need of long-range construction of rule of law,people’s procedural concept need to change in four dimensions:eradicating procedural nihilism,rectifying procedural instrumentalism,discarding procedural formalism and strengthening procedural rationalism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46