检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省滕州市中心人民医院急诊科,277500 [2]山东省滕州市中心人民医院儿科,277500
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2011年第30期3667-3669,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨流程再造在输液中心的应用及其效果。方法调查实施流程再造后240例患者,并与实施流程再造前240例患者进行回顾性对比分析。结果输液流程再造前日均输液量(323.0±8.0)人,再造后(452.0±7.0)人,两者比较差异有统计学意义(t=47.000,P〈Q01);输液流程再造前患者总体满意度为92.08%,再造后为98.75%,两者比较差异有统计学意义(x^2=12.195,P〈0.05)。结论输液中心实施护理流程再造后,提高了护理工作效率,护理缺陷发生率及医院感染发生率明显下降,服务的成本降低,护士服务意识,用人意识增强,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the application and effects of business process reengineering (BPR) in intravenous infusion center. Methods To analyze and compare retrospectively the effects before BPR with those after BPR for 240 cases. Results Infusion volume per day before BPR was (323.0 ± 8.0) person, and (452.0 ± 7.0) person after BPR, and the difference was significant ( t = 47. 000, P 〈 0. 01 ). Degree of satisfaction was 92.08% before BPR and 98.75% after BPR, the difference was statistically significant ( x^2 = 12. 195, P 〈 0. 05). Conclusions After nursing business reengineered in intravenous infusion center, nursing efficiency rates were increased and nursing defect rates, infection rates in hospital and nursing cost were significantly decreased, its worthy of spreading in the clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222