再论无权处分合同的效力——从当事人的角度考察  

Re-discussion on the Effect of the Unauthorized Disposition Contract——From the Perspective of the Parties

作　　者：龚赛红[1,2] 于海旭[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京化工大学 [2]中国社会科学院研究生院法学系

出　　处：《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2011年第6期82-86,共5页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘　　要：学界关于无权处分合同的效力,有效力待定说、无效说、有效说等诸多学说。作为通说的效力待定说认为无权处分合同的效力是一种介于有效和无效之间的模糊状态,这种认识违反了法律的确定性原则。对于无权处分合同效力有争议的原因较多,其中就有切入角度的不同。笔者更倾向于从合同当事人的角度来考察无权处分合同的效力。从无权处分合同当事人角度并区分无权处分合同最终结局的不同情形进行分析,无权处分合同实属有效合同。基于对各方当事人的利益衡量。Regarding the effect of the unauthorized disposition contract, there are many academic theories such as validity in suspense, invalidity, validity, and so on. As the general theory, validity in suspense insists that the effect of the unauthorized disposition contract is in a kind of fuzzy state between validity and invalidity, which is in violation of the principle of legal certainty. There are many reasons for controversy, ineluding analysis of the angle of approach. The author tends to analyze the effect of the unauthorized disposition contract from the perspective of the contracting parties, and according to the different results the unauthorized disposition contract causes, the author thinks the unauthorized disposition contract is always valid. Besides, based on measuring the interests of the parties, the unauthorized disposition contract should be recognized as a valid contract.

关 键 词：无权处分 合同效力 合同当事人 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]