教义刑法学的概念及其价值  

The Concept of Interpretative Criminal Law and Its Value

作　　者：周详[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2011年第6期79-88,共10页Global Law Review

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年项目"中国刑法流派生成问题的文化生态分析"(编号:10YJC820179);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金重点项目"刑法基础理论问题研究"(编号:31540910707)

摘　　要：教义刑法学的根本属性是逻辑性(或者学术性)。教义刑法学是指以刑法规范为根据或逻辑前提,主要运用逻辑推理的方法将法律概念、规范、原则、理论范畴组织起来,形成具有逻辑性最大化的知识体系。在我国特定语境下,规范刑法学与教义刑法学存在差异:在方法层面,规范刑法学主要采取"注释的方法",而教义刑法学主要采取"逻辑推理"的方法;在结果层面,规范刑法学形成的知识体系突出强调"以刑法规范的含义为中心",而教义刑法学则突出强调刑法知识体系本身的逻辑性最大化要求。当前我国学术界对教义刑法学的批判存在几大问题:对狭义刑法学的学科属性存在根本性的误解;对广义的刑事法学内部的各学科之间的特定功能及其关系存在认识上的混乱;对部门法的整体研究状况存在基本的误判;忽视了不同部门法之间的学科特点的差异性以及具体学科发展状态的不平衡性。刑法学界应该坚持"走向教义学的刑法学"之路。From the perspective of academic history of criminal law, at present in China, there are two major theories upheld in criminal law studies, namely, the construction of school of criminal law and the construction of interpretative criminal law. With logic or academic nature being its fundamental attribute, interpretative criminal law refers to the knowledge system that, on the basis of criminal norms or taking them as the logic prerequisite, organizes mutually-differentiated but related legal concepts, norms, principles and theoretical categories by means of logic reasoning. In this way, the logic of this knowledge system can be kept to the maximum. There exist differences between normative criminal law and interpretative criminal law. At the methodology level, the former mainly adopts the ＂method of annotation＂, and the latter, ＂method of logic reasoning＂. At the result level, the knowledge system emerged from normative criminal law emphasizes the approach of ＂taking the meanings of norms of criminal law as the core＂ ; whereas interpretative criminal law stresses the maximization of the logic of the knowledge system of criminal law itself. Currently, criticism of interpretative criminal law within Chinese academic circles has three fatal deficiencies the fundamental misunderstanding of the attribute of branch of learning in terms of special science of criminal law; cognitive confusion over the specific functions of various branches of learning and their relations within general criminal jurisprudence; and a basic misjudgment of the general conditions of research on branch law, which leads to the disregard for differences of characteristics of various branches of law and the imbalance of development of specific branch of learning. The author notes that Chinese criminal law circle should stick to the approach of ＂interpretative criminal law＂.

关 键 词：教义刑法学 规范刑法学 狭义刑法学 法条主义 刑事一体化 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]