检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北医药学院附属东风医院,湖北十堰442008
出 处:《西部医学》2011年第11期2208-2209,共2页Medical Journal of West China
摘 要:目的观察头孢吡肟与氨曲南治疗急性泌尿系统感染的临床疗效,并进行药物经济学评价。方法 78例泌尿系统感染患者随机分成两组,分别给予头孢吡肟(A组)、氨曲南(B组)治疗7d,分析每组的疗效并运用最小成本分析法进行经济学评价。结果 A、B组总有效率分别为92.50%与94.74%(P>0.05),A、B组成本分别为328.5元与604.8元,成本-效果比分别为3.55与6.38。结论头孢吡肟与氨曲南治疗急性泌尿系统感染疗效确切,头孢吡肟更经济。Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efects and cost-profit analysis between cefepime and aztreonam for acute urinary infections.Methods A total of 78 acute urinary infections patients were randomized to Group A(Cefepime) and Group B(Aztreonam) with a course of treatment at 7 days for each Group.The cost-minimization analysis was conducted for the evaluation of the two schemes.Results The effective rate between cefepime and aztreonam were 92.50% and 94v74%(P〉0.05).The total costs of two schernes were 328.5 and 604.8 yuan,the cost-effectiveness ratios were 3.55 and 6.38.Conclusion The results suggest that cefepime and aztreonam is highly efective in treating acute urinary infections.Cefepime was proved to be the best therapeutic regime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.141.175