检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胥美美[1] 贾予平[2] 李国星[1] 潘小川[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学公共卫生学院,北京100191 [2]北京市疾病预防控制中心环境卫生所
出 处:《环境与健康杂志》2011年第11期941-943,F0003,共4页Journal of Environment and Health
基 金:国家自然科学基金(20637020)
摘 要:目的初步评价北京市老年人群大气细颗粒物(PM2.5)的个体综合暴露水平。方法采用定组研究设计,于2007年7月—2008年8月分8个日期区段(周期)对北京市某社区的60名有心血管病既往病史的老年人进行室内外PM2.5质量浓度监测,并采用时间活动模式问卷收集时间活动数据,进行统计学分析。结果北京市某社区室外各周期PM2.5日均质量浓度为(85.5±48.7)μg/m3,室内PM2.5日均质量浓度为(110.5±77.5)μg/m3,均高于WHO空气质量标准。除第1周期外,其他周期每日室内活动时间比例均高于90%。研究期间个体综合暴露浓度为(113.3±79.0)μg/m3,与室内浓度变化一致;与室外浓度相比,夏季趋势一致,春冬季有较大不同。结论本次调查的北京市某社区老年人群PM2.5暴露水平较高;室内暴露水平与时间加权暴露水平相近,可用于研究健康效应。Objective To evaluate personal integrated exposure level to PM2.5 for the aged people in Beijing. Methods Panel study design was employed. The level,s of indoor and outdoor PM2.5 were monitored from July, 2007 to August, 2008 for the subject persons, and the data of their time-activity pattern were collected by the questionnaire. Multiple linear regression was used for data analysis. Results The d^fily mean concentrations of outdoor and indoor PM2.5 were (85.5±48.7)μg/m3 and (110.5±77.5)μg/m3 respectively, higher than WHO air quality standards. Indoor-activity-time of the other periods accounted for more than 90% except the first period. The average integrated level of personal exposure to PM2.5 was (113.3±79.0)μg/m3 for the aged subjects , closed to the indoor PM2.5 level and only had the same tendency as outdoor PM2.5 concentration in summer. Conclusion The exposure level to PM2.5 of the aged people in Beijing was relatively higher. Indoor PM2.5 level is approximate to integrated exposure level, which can be used as an indicator for the study of exposure and health effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4