检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖新民[1] 周生焰[1] 罗顺文[1] 崔玉川[1] 江金秀[1] 马小平[1] 顾新伟[1]
机构地区:[1]成都解放军第452医院,泌尿男性科
出 处:《现代泌尿外科杂志》1998年第2期104-107,共4页Journal of Modern Urology
摘 要:1992年6月至1996年6月,我们对使用镇痛解痉剂无效的频发肾绞痛36例,采用腰大肌旁沟穿刺置管阻滞(IBPC)治疗,显效30例(83%),有效4例(11%),总有效率94%,13例排出结石(36%),对照组4例均无效。未见任何严重并发症。本研究提示IBPC是治疗肾绞痛安全有效的一种方法,并有排石作用。文中对IBPC的作用原理、方法、疗效等进行实验性观察及讨论。The authors reported the results of treatment of 36 patients of recurrent ureteral colica by inserting a tube and block of psoas compartment (IBPC) since June. 1992. All patints were inefficient to anal- gesic treatment. The notable effect was obtained in 30 cases and obtained effect in 4. The overall effective rate was 94%. Noserious complicatins occurred and the stones were passed in 13 cases after IBPC, In the control group, however, none of the was effective. The results showed that IBFC is a safe and effective method of treating recurrent ureteral colica. The authors also discussed on the mechanism of action, operational method and efficience of IBPC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.82.202