检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许太武[1] 丁玉兴[1] 董发团[1] 王慧明[1] 杨绍琴
机构地区:[1]成都军区昆明总医院麻醉科,昆明650032 [2]成都军区昆明总医院手术室,昆明650032
出 处:《西南国防医药》1997年第1期7-8,共2页Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China
摘 要:作者就120例患者采用注气、注液两种方法对其硬膜外阻滞镇痛效果进行分组观察。结果表明,麻醉平面出现时间,麻醉平面范围及镇痛效果均无显著差异(P>0.05)。作者认为,Dalens提出注气法是硬膜外镇痛不全的原因之一,并提出废除的观点值得商榷。本文认为,注气法弹性回缩好,易于判断,使用方便,并侧重对两者的优缺点进行探讨。Objective:To observe and compare the extradural blocking analgesic effects by inflation and infusion. Methods: 120 patients were randomly divided into inflation group and infusion group. Results: There was neither significant time and area difference in the appearing of anesthesia level, nor in the analgesic effects. Conclusion: Dalens'opinion that inflation was the leading factor causing extradural incomplete analgesia and should have been abolished should be questioned. Analgesia by inflation is easy to judge, convenient, and can be elasticly recoiling during operation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117