经桡动脉途径和股动脉途径行老年冠心病介入治疗的对照研究  

Coronary interventional therapy for the elderly patients with coronary heart disease through transradial and transfemoral percutaneous

作　　者：杨溢[1] 陆秀红[1] 刘伟[1] 秦孺子[1] 何静[1] 杨昱[1] 胡川[1] 张圭[1] 

机构地区：[1]武警广东总队医院老年病科,广东广州510507

出　　处：《中国医药导报》2011年第33期43-44,共2页China Medical Herald

摘　　要：目的：探讨经桡动脉途径和股动脉途径行老年冠心病介入治疗的疗效。方法：将我科2008年10月~2010年6月收治的90例需行冠状动脉介入治疗的老年冠心病患者,按穿刺途径分为桡动脉组和股动脉组,每组45例,比较两组患者的穿刺时间、手术操作时间、手术成功率、术后并发症、不适反应、X线曝光时间及住院时间。结果：桡动脉组与股动脉组手术操作时间、手术成功率、X线曝光时间方面比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。桡动脉组术后血管并发症、不适反应及住院时间方面显著少于股动脉组,穿刺时间长于股动脉组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01或P〈0.05）。结论：经桡动脉途径和股动脉途径都是治疗老年冠心病的良好方法,经桡动脉术后并发症及不适反应少,且住院时间短,相对增加患者的舒适度,值得临床推广应用。Objective： To assess the effectiveness and safety of transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary interventional therapy for the elderly patients with coronary heart disease.Methods： From October 2008 to June 2010,90 elderly patients with coronary heart disease who should do coronary intervention,were randomly divided into radial artery group and femoral artery group according to puncture approaches,each group had 45 cases.Puncture time,operation time,surgical success rate,the postoperative complications,discomfort reaction,X-ray exposure time and length of hospitalization of the two groups were compared.Results： There was no significant difference of operation time,surgical success rate and X-ray exposure time between the two groups（P0.05）,the rate of total vascular complications,discomfort reaction and hospitalization time of the radial artery group were less than those of femoral artery group（P0.01）,puncture time was longer than that of femoral artery group（P0.05）.Conclusion： In the elderly patients with coronary heart disease,transradial coronary angoplasty has the same success rate,but less postoperative complications and discomfort reaction and shorter hospitalization time compared with transfemoral approach.Transradial approach is a safe and feasible method.

关 键 词：桡动脉 股动脉 老年冠心病 介入治疗 

分 类 号：R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]