检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭淑牖[1] 江献川[1] 李君达[1] 蔡秀军[1] 彭承宏[1] 牟一平[1] 苏英[1] 范明敏[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江医科大学附属第二医院外科,浙江医大附属邵逸夫医院,浙江医大附属第二医院外科研究所
出 处:《中国普外基础与临床杂志》1995年第1期11-14,共4页Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
摘 要:本文描述一种简易、安全的断肝法─—刮吸法,同时介绍一种高效率的器械─—彭氏多功能手术解剖器(PMOD)。文中还对刮吸法切肝和钳折法切肝二组病人进行了比较,每组各46人。结果:平均出血量刮吸法为钳折法的一半(P<0.01),平均断肝时间也是刮吸法短于钳折法,约缩短40%(P<0.01)。讨论了指折法、钳折法、微波刀、激光刀、水射和超声解剖器(CUSA)等方法的器械的优缺点。认为刮吸法的优点超过其它各种方法;PMOD较之CUSA经济、实用、安全和高效。An easy and safe technique, liver transection by curettage and aspiration (LTCA), using an efficient instrument, Peng's multifunction operative dissector (PMOD) is described in this article. A comparison between two groups of patients undergoing hepatectomy were made. One group were operat ed on with LTCA; the other group with forceps crush method (FCM). Results: the amount of blood loss with LTCA was only half of that with FCM. The time needed for liver transection with LTCA was 40 percent shorter than that with FCM. After comparision of a variety of currently available techniques and surgical instruments, it is concluded that LTCA is superior to all other techniques, while PMOD is superior to CUSA.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171