输卵管绝育术银夹法与抽芯包埋法的比较观察——附4825例报告  

A comparative study on tubal sterilization using Silver Clip method and salpingectomy: 4825 cases report.

作　　者：朱定兴 

机构地区：[1]浙江省瑞安市计划生育技术指导站

出　　处：《中国计划生育学杂志》1993年第2期74-76,127,共4页Chinese Journal of Family Planning

摘　　要：本文比较了输卵管绝育术银夹法2317例和抽芯包埋法2508例术后失败率及并发症发生率。观察时间为1年至4年10个月。结果表明银夹法和抽芯包埋法的失败率均低于0. 2%。两组比较无显著差异。对于并发症之发生率,如月经紊乱、神经官能症及盆腔淤血症,两组比较也无显著差异。但由于银夹法手术创伤小、速度快,并发症症状轻,复孕成功率高等优点,更易被广大育龄妇女所接受。对于有炎症或粗大的输卵管,抽芯包埋法优于银夹法。总之,两种输卵管绝育术均为简便、安全、有效的女性绝育术,值得推广使用。We compared two tubal sterilizations which were Silver Clip method(2317 cases) and Salpingectomy(2508 cases), and observed the rates for failure and complica-tion. The follow-up time is one year to four years and ten months. The results show that the failure rates for Silver Clip method and Salpingectomy were less than 0.2%, and there was no significance difference between two groups. For failure rate there was no significance differ-ence between two groups. For complication, there was no significance difference between two groups too. During the study we found the women favour Silver Clip method because this method is fast, there are litter wound for body, and the symptoms of complication is slight. Our re-sults indicate that female sterilization with the Silver Clip method and Salpingectomy is simple, safe and reliable method in preventing pregnancy.

关 键 词：女性绝育术 银夹法 抽芯包埋法 

分 类 号：R169[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]