检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北医药学院附属东风医院药学部,湖北十堰442008
出 处:《中国药业》2011年第21期55-56,共2页China Pharmaceuticals
摘 要:目的分析3种不同治疗方案对老年患者下呼吸道感染所产生的疗效及经济效果。方法将98例住院患者随机分成3组,分别给予头孢地嗪(A组)、甲磺酸帕珠沙星(B组)、哌拉西林舒巴坦(C组)治疗10 d,运用最小成本法进行经济学评价。结果 A组、B组、C组总有效率分别为85.29%,87.50%,81.25%,成本-效果比分别为14.26,13.23,17.43。结论甲磺酸帕珠沙星治疗老年患者下呼吸道感染是较佳方案。Objective To evaluate the pharmacoeconomic effects of three antibacterial drug therapies for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection(LRTI) in elderly patients.Methods A total of 98 LRTI patients were randomized to cefodizime(group A),pazufloxacin(group B) and piperacillin/sulbactam(group C) with a course of treatment at 10 days for each group.The cost-minimization analysis was conducted for the evaluation of the three schemes.Results The effective rate of the three groups(A,B,C) were 85.29%,87.50%,81.25%,respectively;the cost-effectiveness ratios were 14.26,13.23,17.43,respectively.Conclusion The regimen of pazufloxacin is the optimal one among the 3 groups for lower respiratory tract infection in elderly patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.89.16