反垄断损害赔偿制度的构建——基于《反垄断法》第50条的思考  

On the Antitrust Liability for Damages Construction——Reflection of the Article 50 of Anti-monopoly Law

作　　者：张骏[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学法学院,福建泉州362021

出　　处：《中北大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第2期61-65,71,共6页Journal of North University of China：Social Science Edition

基　　金：华侨大学高层次人才科研启动项目(10BS308)

摘　　要：反垄断损害赔偿责任与民事损害赔偿责任在目的、构成要件及实现方式等方面都有着显著的区别。但是我国现行的《反垄断法》第50条无视两者的这些差别,规定极为简单,并以民法为依据,这无疑会影响到我国《反垄断法》的实施效果。因此,应当在《反垄断法》中更为明确地规定反垄断损害赔偿制度。There are such differences between antitrust liability for damages and civil liability for damages, as their purpose, components, and the ways of achieving. But article 50 of Anti-monopoly Law in our country is very simple and based on civil law, affects the implementation of antitrust effect. Therefore, legislators should provide antitrust liability for damages clearly in Anti-monopoly Law.

关 键 词：反垄断法 民事损害赔偿 反垄断损害赔偿制度 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]