Clinical Study on Hydro-acupuncture for Hypomenorrhea  

水针治疗月经过少临床研究(英文)

作　　者：刘媛媛 庄素卿 陆仁敏 

机构地区：[1]Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Zhuhai Hospital, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2]Macao University of Science and Technology

出　　处：《Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science》2011年第5期307-309,共3页针灸推拿医学（英文版）

摘　　要：Objective： To observe the curative effect of hydro-acupuncture for treatment of hypomenorrhea. Methods ： A total of 72 cases of hypomenorrhea were randomly allocated into an observation group and a control group, with 36 cases in each group. Hydro-acupuncture was used in the observation group and acupuncture treatment in the control group. Menstrual blood volume （MBV） was observed in each phase of treatment in the two groups and the curative effects in the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results： After 3 months of treatment, the total effective rate in the observation group was 100.0% and 91.7% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. In the course of treatment, 1 month and 2 months after treatment, the observation group results were superior to those in the control group （P〈0.01; P〈0.05） in the improvement of MBV. Conclusion： Both hydro-acupuncture and acupuncture are effective methods for treatment of hypomenorrheal, and hydro-acupuncture is not only faster in its effect but superior to acupuncture treatment in overall efficacy.目的:观察水针治疗月经过少的治疗效果。方法:72 例月经过少患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各 36 例。观察组采用水针穴位注射治疗。对照组采用针刺治疗。观察两组患者各个治疗阶段的月经量,并分析比较两组临床疗效。结果:治疗 3 个月后,观察组总有效率为 100.0%,对照组总有效率为 91.7%,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗过程中,治疗 1 个月后和治疗 2 个月后对经量的改善程度均是观察组优于对照组(P<0.01; P<0.05)。结论:水针和针刺两种疗法均可治疗月经过少的有效方法,而水针疗法不仅起效较快,而且总体疗效优于单纯针刺法。

关 键 词：HYDRO-ACUPUNCTURE Acupuncture Therapy Menstruation Disturbances OLIGOMENORRHEA 

分 类 号：R246.3[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]