检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学言语听觉科学教育部重点实验室,上海200062 [2]华东师范大学言语听觉康复科学系
出 处:《听力学及言语疾病杂志》2011年第6期506-508,共3页Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
基 金:言语听觉科学教育部重点实验室开放课题基金(2010HSOP001)资助
摘 要:目的探讨呼吸方式对健听与听障儿童最长声时(maximum phonation time,MPT)、最大数数能力(maximum counting ability,MCA)的影响及MPT与MCA之间的关系。方法将113例3~6岁儿童分为健听组(85人)和听障组(28人),均进行MPT和MCA测试,分析不同呼吸方式、听力状况、不同年龄、不同性别对结果的影响。结果呼吸方式会对MPT产生影响(P<0.01),但不会影响MCA(P>0.05);年龄会影响MPT和MCA(P<0.05),年龄越大,MPT和MCA值越大;不同性别受试者MPT和MCA差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);听力状况不影响MPT和MCA(P>0.05);MPT和MCA之间存在显著正相关(r=0.561,P<0.01)。结论呼吸方式会显著影响健听和听障儿童的呼吸支持能力,但不会显著影响其呼吸与发声的协调能力。Objective To discuss the effects of breathing pattern on MPT and MCA in normal hearing children and children with hearing impairments,and the correlation between MPT and MCA.Methods 113 cases of 3~6 years old children were divided into the normal hearing(85 cases) and the deaf groups(28 cases) and all received MPT and MCA test.The two groups were compared for different ages and genders.Results The breathing pattern showed significant differences on MPT(P0.01),but not on MCA(P0.05).Ages demonstrated significant differences both on MPT and MCA(P0.05).MPT and MCA increased as a function aging.The hearing status had no significant difference on MPT and MCA(P0.05).The correlation between MPT and MCA was significant(r=561,P0.01).Conclusion The breathing pattern can affect the support of respiratory in normal hearing children and children with hearing impairments,but not the coordination of respiration and phonation.
分 类 号:R767.92[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28