检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李开传[1]
机构地区:[1]山东财经大学人文艺术学院,山东济南250014
出 处:《山东财政学院学报》2011年第6期58-62,共5页Journal of Shandong Finance Institute
摘 要:中国宏观税收负是高是低?理论界一直众说纷纭,原因在于学者们所使用的衡量口径各不相同。从税收负担指标的可比性和财政支出与税收收入的匹配性角度,考察不同衡量口径下的中国宏观税收负担,认为用"财政性税收占可征税收入的比率"来描述一个国家的宏观税收负担比较合理,同时判断税收负担合理性还应该考虑单位税收的公共服务支出水平。总体看,中国的宏观税收负担较高,但应该客观看待中国宏观税收负担在福布斯税负痛苦指数排行榜上居前的问题。China's macro tax burden level has been controversial in theoretical circles. Scholars have investigated different Chinese macro tax burden levels with various kinds of measurements from the perspective of the comparability of indicators and the fitness of financial expenditure and tax revenue, and they believe that it's more reasonable to use" the percentage of fiscal revenue in tax revenue "to describe same time, we should consider the public service expenditure level. Ove is higher, we should view objectively China's ranking high on Forbes tax a country's macro tax burden level. At the rail, though China's macro tax burden level misery index list.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145