悖论伦理:《亚当·贝德》中海蒂的孩子死因新论  

Paradoxical Morality: A New View on the Death Causes of Hetty's Child in Adam Bede

作　　者：廖昌胤[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学文学研究院

出　　处：《国外文学》2011年第4期117-125,共9页Foreign Literatures

基　　金：国家社会科学基金2010年度一般项目"当代英美悖论诗学反思研究"(10BWW016);教育部人文社会科学研究2009年度规划基金项目"当代英美文学批评视角中的悖论诗学研究"(09YJA752014)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：迄今人们都将海蒂与亚瑟的爱情解读为不合伦理,他们的结局是对"坏人"的处罚。相反,本文认为,《亚当·贝德》采用了内嵌式对话句,即在同情海蒂与亚瑟的句子里嵌入了社会伦理观对二人的攻击之辞。小说并非只是重复着一个"好人好报"的俗套,而是揭示工业化社会伦理观念的悖论,这个悖论就是披着"美好"的伦理外衣扼杀真情,以貌似"伦理"的观念掩盖最不符合伦理的罪恶。Readers of Adam Bede may think that the love between Arthur and Hetty is unethical and that the end of their love is a punishment to ＂corrupted people＂. To the contrary, this essay reveals that the novel applies an indented dialogic discourse, with the attacks from social prejudice indented in a pathetic tone. This paradoxical structure shows that the novel is not a sheer repetition of the old theme of ＂good people, good reward＂, but a revealment of a contradiction inherent in the moral values of the industrialized society： the murder of true love by an evil in the disguise of morality.

关 键 词：《亚当·贝德》 海蒂 伦理 悖论 

分 类 号：I561[文学—其他各国文学]