检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川大学中国休闲与旅游研究中心,四川成都610064 [2]四川大学旅游学院,四川成都610064
出 处:《旅游学刊》2011年第12期78-83,共6页Tourism Tribune
摘 要:自真实性引入旅游研究以来,学者们从多学科及多种意识形态来解释真实性,衍生了大量的真实性概念,但这些概念大多不在同一个逻辑层面上来探讨问题,致使真实性问题扑朔迷离。文章通过事实的、认识的、信念的三个层面来考察"真实性",从逻辑层面上理顺并构建了从客观性真实性、相对性真实性到绝对性真实性的"真实性"体系。事实上,只有在信仰的层面上,才会有绝对的真实性,对客观性真实性和相对性真实性的讨论,在本质上是没有多大意义的,旅游者通过体验,在旅游地完成了"诗意地栖居",仅此而言,旅游对于人类生活,功莫大焉。Since authenticity was introduced into tourism study, scholars have explained authenticity from the perspective of multidisciplines and multi-ideologies and derived a host of concepts about authenticity, but most of these concepts do not discuss problems from the same logic layer, which leads to complication and confusion about authenticity. The paper, from three layers of facts, recognition and faith to inspect " authenticity", tries to arrange and establish " authenticity" system from objective and relative authenticity to absolute authenticity. In fact, only on the layer of faith, can we have absolute authenticity. Discussion about objective and relative authenticity is in essence meaningless. Tourists only complete their " poetic stay in tourist attractions". Tourism plays an important role in human lives.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222