检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈越鹏[1]
出 处:《广东商学院学报》2011年第6期84-90,共7页Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies
摘 要:从法律经济学的视角观之,惩罚性赔偿实乃具有公益性,且依靠"私人执法"的实现形式有助于激励群众维护公益从而降低执法成本,因此,惩罚性赔偿在法经济学上具有完整正当性。在此前提下借鉴美国侵权法的改革举措,可知建立惩罚性赔偿公益基金以使更多受害人获益是该制度正当性的逻辑结果和客观要求,也是侵权法发展的重要趋势。在制度设计上,应在机构设置、信息公开、收归程序、申请发放程序等方面加以斟酌。From the perspective of law and economics, the nature of punitive damages is the public welfare, and we can not break the local and global linkages; "private enforcement" contributes to inspiring the masses to maintain the public order, so as to reduce the cost of legal enforcement. Therefore, in law and economics punitive damages has a complete legitimacy. On this premise, drawing the United States tort law reform initiatives, we can see that establishment of punitive damages community foundation is not only the logical result of the legitimacy of the system and an objective requirement, but also an important trend in tort law. In the system design, it is suggested to consider the institutional arrangement, information disclosure, reverting program, and application procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145