中法两国公务员救济制度的比较分析——以完善中国公务员救济制度为视角  

France and China Comparative Analysis of Civil Relief System——On the Perspective of Improving China's Civil Relief System

作　　者：王方东[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共吉林省委党校,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《行政与法》2011年第11期92-95,共4页Administration and Law

摘　　要：在法国,为了防止行政主体的侵害,公务员具有行政上的保护手段和司法上的保护手段;在中国,公务员只能通过申诉控告维护自己的权益。中法两国在公务员救济制度方面的不同缘于两国在公务员关系理论、权利规定及行政诉讼等方面的不同。借鉴法国的经验,结合我国的具体国情,完善中国的公务员救济制度应该从以下三个方面着手:第一,摒弃特别权力关系理论;第二,扩大公务员权利范围;第三,完善公务员救济途径。In France,the administrative body in order to prevent violations of the civil service protection with administrative means and judicial means of protection;in China,the civil service only through the complaint,to protect their interests.The difference between France and China in the civil service system is due to the difference of Civil relations theory,regulations and administrative litigation rights between the two countries.Learn from the experience of France,combined with China＇s specific national conditions,improve China＇s civil relief system should be from the following three aspects：first,to abandon the theory of power relations in particular;second,to expand the scope of civil rights;third,improved civil remedies.

关 键 词：公务员救济 特别权力关系 行政诉讼 公务员权利 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]