死刑案件刑事和解——法治与反法治之辩  

On Criminal Reconciliation of Death penalty cases——The discussion rule of law or against of rule

作　　者：王满生[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学,江西南昌330022

出　　处：《行政与法》2011年第11期115-118,共4页Administration and Law

基　　金：2011年江西省高校人文社会科学项目"和谐社会中的轻罪刑事和解"的部分研究成果;项目编号:FX1115

摘　　要：本文以法治作为思考刑事和解的视角,探讨了死刑案件进行刑事和解的合理性。就刑事个案而言,刑事和解可以促进法治的权利保障功能,降低死刑的判决率,维护被告人的生命权。通过对被害一方进行经济补偿、道歉等方式维护被害方的合法权益,缓和被害方的对抗情绪,减少申诉上访,促进法治的秩序功能。但从法治的整体上看,刑事和解可能造成司法的重大不公,导致更大的司法腐败,最终将危及法治基础,对法治的形成产生长久消极影响。the article discusses the rationality of reconciliation of Death penalty as the perspective of rule of law.In specific criminal case,criminal reconciliation can promote the rule of law,reduce the right protection function of the death penalty.At the same time,maintenance the interests of the party,reduce petitions,ease against mood by a party of slain compensation and apologize.As a whole point of view,criminal reconciliation may cause the great injustice judicial,produce major judicial Corruption,eventually will endanger the foundation of law,produce the negative effect for the rule of law for a long time.

关 键 词：死刑案件 刑事和解 法治 反法治 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]