检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李梅[1] 陈静[1] 陈大红[1] 杨双[1] 杨娟[1] 蔡琳[1]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院放射科,江苏南京210029
出 处:《实用临床医药杂志》2011年第20期117-119,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
摘 要:目的探讨优质护理在放射科中的应用及成效。方法随机将2011年1月--2011年8月于本院放射科进行造影检查的558例患者分为干预组280例、对照组278例。干预组给予优质护理服务,对照组给予常规护理,比较两组患者造影中不良反应及患者满意度。结果两组造影中不良反应比较无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。干预组满意度99%(277/280),明显高于对照组满意度89%(247/278)(Fisher确切概率值26.56,P〈0.001)。结论将优质护理应用于放射科中可提高患者对影像学检查的满意度,更有利于各项检查的开展,值得临床推广。Objective To explore the nursing in department of radiology. Methods implementation and effectiveness of high - quality 558 patients who received contrast radiography in our department from January 2011 to August 2011 were randomly divided into 2 groups: interferential group and control group. They were provided with high - quality nursing and conventional nursing respectivdy. The adverse reaction and satisfaction of the patients were used to investigate the effectiveness of two schedule modes. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 〉0.05). The satisfaction degree of the interferential group (99 %, 77/280) was signifi- cant higher than that of control group (89 %, 247/278) (fisher's exact test value was 26.56, P〈0. 001 ). Conclusion The implementation of high - quality nursing could elevate satisfaction degree of patients and profit for the examination in contrast to radiography. Therefore, this project deserves further clinical popularization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15