海伦·朗基诺与唐娜·哈拉维的知识观比较分析  

Comparison of the Knowledge Conception Between Helene E. Longino and Donna Haraway

作　　者：郭丽丽[1,2] 洪晓楠[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学科技伦理与科技管理研究中心 [2]大连理工大学人文学院,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2011年第6期84-88,128,共5页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(09BZX003);“教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划”(NCET-07-0129);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助人文社科基地项目(851014)

摘　　要：在女性主义科学批判的思潮中,朗基诺和哈拉维都对传统的科学进行了批判。朗基诺对知识的相关问题做出了新的理解并提出其独特的"语境经验论(contextual empiricism)",哈拉维则提出了"情境化知识(Situated Knowledge)"。这两个学说表面上看很相似,实际上却又有区别。文章从思想来源、对传统科学哲学的态度、对情境的理解以及对知识与权力关系的态度四个方面对这两个学说进行比较分析,揭示二者的异同,以更深刻地理解女性主义科学哲学中关于知识的两种具有代表性的观点。In the trend of feminist critique for science, Helene E. Longino and Donna Haraway both criticize the traditionalscience. Concerning knowledge, Helene E. Longino puts forward 'contextual empiricism', and Donna Haraway brings forward'situated knowledge' correspondingly. The two theories seem similar, but there are differences actually. The paper analyses the twotheories from four aspects----ideological source, the attitude to the traditional philosophy of science, the understanding of thesituation and the attitude to the relationship between knowledge and power, and reveals the similarities and differences of the twotheories in order to understand the two representative points of view about knowledge in feminist philosophy of science more deeply.

关 键 词：情境化知识 语境经验论 二元论 客观性 知识与权力 

分 类 号：N0[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]