论北美汉学界中国古代文论研究中的“两种取向”  

On Two Approaches to Traditional Chinese Literary Thought in North American Sinology

作　　者：任增强 王小萍 

机构地区：[1]中国石油大学(华东)文学院,山东青岛266555 [2]中共铅山县委党校,江西铅山334500

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2011年第6期140-143,共4页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"海外汉学与中国文论"(2007JJD751073)

摘　　要：北美汉学界中国古代文论研究有两种取向:"冲击—回应"说与"中国中心观"。前者认为中国文论的发展进程中一切具有历史意义的变化只能在外来冲击下才能引起,片面夸大外来影响的作用,这实际上是一种"西方中心主义"的思维模式,试图以西方理论来置换中国文论;后者着意强调中西文学思想间的异质与对立,凸显中国文论本身的特殊性,但这又容易滑向文化相对主义,否认中西间的可比性。放弃任何形式的"中心主义",在尊重差异的前体下,充分认识两种文化各自的特质,通过平等对话与交流,实现互识与互补,方可扩大对文论根本性问题的共识。＂ Impact - response＂ and China - centered approaches are two models in the field of traditional Chinese literary thought studies in North America. The former argues that the foreign impacts, which are overstated actually, caused any historic changes in traditional Chinese literary thought. It is kind of west - centered thinking with the attempt of replacing the Chinese literary thought with the western theories; the latter emphasizes the heterogeneity and opposition, foregrounding the particularity of the traditional Chinese literary thought. It is prone to cultural relativism, denying Chinese -western comparativeness. Thus, the difference of the two cultures should be fully recognized without any centrism. Only by equal dialogue and exchange, can common understanding of literary thought be achieved.

关 键 词：北美汉学 中国文论 研究取向 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]