检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华麻醉学杂志》1999年第12期714-716,共3页Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
摘 要:目的 观察肾上腺素对1%罗哌卡因硬膜外阻滞的药效学和药动学影响。方法 选择ASAI~Ⅱ级行下腹部手术病人16例,随机分为两组。每组8例。分别用1%罗哌卡因2mg·kg^-1(R组)和加入1:200000肾上腺素的1%罗哌卡因2mg·kg^-1(RE组)行硬膜外阻滞,对比两组药效学和药代动力学指标,结果 两组药效学指标,Cmax和AUC间均无显著性差异。与R组相比,RE组的Tmax明显后延(P〈0.Objective To determine the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ropivacaine used with or without epinephrine for epidural blockade. Methods Sixteen ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ adult patients undergoing elective lower abdominal surgery, were randomly divided into two groups, in group R (n=8) epidural blockade was induced with 1% ropivacaine 2mg. kg-1 without epinephrine, while in group RE (n=8) with 1% ropivacaine Zing· kg-1 with 1: 200 000 epinephrine. The onset time, the duration of analgesia and motor blockade degree of both groups were observed and plasma concentrations of ropivacaine of both groups were measured with gas chromatography. Results There were no significant differences in pharmacodynamic parameters, peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve between both groups. The time to peak plasma concentration in group RE was longer than that in group R (P<0. 01). The elimination rate constant of group RE was lower than that of group R (P<0.05). Conclusion Addition of epinephrine can not affect the pharmacodynamics of epidural 1% ropivacaine, but the absorption and elimination rates of which is reduced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15