检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省都江堰市人民医院康复科,四川都江堰611830
出 处:《实用中医药杂志》2011年第12期817-818,共2页Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察推拿配合中药与牵引配合中药对神经根型颈椎病急性发作的疗效。方法:60例随机分为两组各30例,治疗组用推拿手法配合中药治疗和对照组用牵引配合中药治疗,统计分析比较两组治疗后疗效。结果:两组总有效率比较有显著性差异(P<0.05),VAS评分差值比较有极显著性差异(P<0.01),治疗组较对照组疗效好。结论:推拿手法配合中药治疗神经根型颈椎病急性发作疗效更好。Objective:observe and compare the curative effects of the Tuina combined traditional Chinese medicine therapy and the cervical traction combined traditional Chinese medicine therapy to treat spondylose cervicale radiculaire. Method : random divide the cases into the Tuina combined traditional Chinese medicine therapy group and the cervical traction combined traditional Chinese medicine therapy group. Statistics, analyse and compare the curative effects of the two groups. Results : the curative effects of the two groups have statistical significance (P 〈 0.05). The Tuina combined traditional Chinese medicine therapy has a more obvious variances in VAS grade( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion:the Tuina combined traditional Chinese medicine therapy has a obvious superiority than the cervical traction combined traditional Chinese medicine therapy in treating spondylose cervicale radiculaire.
关 键 词:神经根型颈椎病急性发作 推拿 中药 对照治疗观察
分 类 号:R255.681.55[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117