检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:衡墩前
机构地区:[1]江苏省新沂市中医院骨伤科,江苏新沂221400
出 处:《实用中医药杂志》2011年第12期853-854,共2页Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察手法配合牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:120例随机分为治疗组60例和对照组60例,治疗组用手法配合牵引治疗,对照组只用牵引治疗1,0天为一疗程,两组均治疗2~3个疗程后进行疗效评价。结果:总有效率治疗组90.0%、对照组78.3%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后疼痛积分均明显下降,与治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),治疗组治疗后疼痛积分下降更明显,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:手法配合牵引治疗腰椎间盘突出症比单用牵引疗效更好。Objective:Comprehensive treatment of methods based clinical effect of lumbar disc herniation. Methods :120 patients with lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into treatment group ( n = 60) and control group ( n = 60 ), the control group with lumbar traction therapy, the treatment group were based on the addition of manual therapy, both groups 2 to 3 treatment efficacy evaluation after treatment. Results :The total effective rate in treatment group 90.0% and control group 78.3%, compared to significantly (P 〈 0.05 ). After treatment, pain scores were significantly decreased compared with that before treatment there were significant differences (P 〈 0.01 ), pain scores in treatment group decreased more significantly, compared with the control group after treatment was significantly ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : To practice - based comprehensive treatment of lumbar disc herniation and lumbar traction therapy than the simple application of better efficacy.
关 键 词:腰椎间盘突出症 手法治疗 腰椎牵引 对照治疗观察
分 类 号:R244.181.53[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38