检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵伟[1]
出 处:《系统科学学报》2011年第4期13-17,75,共6页Chinese Journal of Systems Science
摘 要:当今时代,各种复杂性理论变体对于经典形而上学思维带来了挑战,并引起了人们对于复杂性理论是否是科学的怀疑。为了理解什么是复杂性以及怎么应对它所带来的形而上学新问题。首先,给出一个关于复杂性的相对定义,并介绍"复杂性"理论的三个发展阶段成果;其次,比较研究经典思维和复杂性思维的形而上学预设的冲突;最后,建构适应于复杂性理论的形而上学的构成承诺和构成原则。Nowadays,all kinds of theories of complexity have brourht about challenges to the classical metaphysical thinking,and cause people to be doubtful whether the theories of complexity are scientific.In order to understand what is complexity and how to cope with the new metaphysical problems it produced.Firstly,give a relevant notion about complexity,and offers a chronological presentation of three generations of theories that have shaped its uses;secondly,compare and study the comflicts of metaphysical preferences between the classical thinking and the complexity thinking;in the end,construct the constitutive commitments and the constitutive principles which are adapted to complexity theories.
关 键 词:复杂性 经典思维 复杂性思维 构成承诺 构成原则
分 类 号:N94-02[自然科学总论—系统科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.114