网络成瘾者与正常个体对文字信息注意偏向的对照研究  

A control study on attentional bias to text information between internet addiction individuals and normal individuals

作　　者：廖扬[1] 张茜茹[1] 朱填莉[1] 刘旭峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]第四军医大学心理学教研室,西安710032

出　　处：《山西医科大学学报》2011年第11期892-895,共4页Journal of Shanxi Medical University

摘　　要：目的探讨网络成瘾者与正常个体对文字信息的注意偏向差异及其原因。方法采用物质成瘾Stroop范式任务和词汇类型辨别任务,对比分析了16名网络成瘾个体和16名正常对照个体对与网络相关程度不同的文字信息的注意加工特点。结果在网络成瘾组中,在物质成瘾Stroop范式任务上,网络相关文字信息能引发较大的Stroop效应量(t=7.289,P<0.01);在词汇类型辨别任务上,对网络相关文字信息的辨别反应时快于对网络无关文字信息的辨别反应时,其差异具有统计学意义(F=22.18,P<0.01);而正常对照组对两类文字信息的辨别反应时之间没有显著差异(F=1.90,P>0.05)。结论网络成瘾个体存在对网络相关文字信息的注意偏向,而正常个体不存在这种注意偏向现象。两者对文字信息注意偏向的差异可能是由于网络成瘾个体对于网络相关文字信息这类成瘾相关刺激更为敏感造成的。Objective To explore the difference and reason of attentional bias to text information between internet addiction individuals and normal individuals.Methods Addiction-Stroop task and vocabulary type of discrimination task were used for exploring the difference of attention processing of varying degrees of network-related text information between 16 internet addiction individuals and 16 normal controls.Results In addiction-Stroop task,the network-related text information aroused a higher Stroop effect in the internet addiction individuals than normal controls,and the difference was statistically significant（t=7.289,P0.01）.In the word discrimination task,internet addiction individuals had a quicker response to the network-related text information than to the normal text information,and the difference was statistically significant（F=22.18,P0.01）;while the normal controls had no significant difference in distinguishing the two types of text information（F=1.90,P0.05）.Conclusion Internet addiction individuals have an attentional bias to network-related text information while normal individuals do not.This difference may be caused by a higher sensitivity to addiction-related stimulus in internet addiction individuals.

关 键 词：网络成瘾 STROOP效应 注意偏向 自动化行为图式 

分 类 号：R395[哲学宗教—心理学]