检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖冬梅[1]
出 处:《图书馆论坛》2011年第6期282-288,共7页Library Tribune
基 金:国家社科基金项目"信息资源配置的区域性差距及公共政策调整研究"(项目编号:08CTQ011)成果之一
摘 要:谷歌数字图书馆计划自2004年诞生起便遭到了多方反对,从遍布网络的口诛笔伐,直至美国、法国和中国的对簿公堂。法国的司法判决和美国的司法审查都表明该计划的实施侵犯了版权法,先授权后使用的版权规则成为置身于现行版权框架下的谷歌难以逾越的壁垒。2011年美国纽约南区法院巡回法官和第二巡回上诉法院先后驳回了谷歌图书和解协议,使得谷歌在突破版权壁垒的征程中又回到了原点。该协议被驳回的原因主要包括集体诉讼原告方的代表性及"孤儿作品"的垄断性利用。谷歌图书和解协议虽被否决,但其积极的探索使得数字图书馆的版权瓶径问题备受关注,其版权解决方案将为立法机关修改版权规则提供新的思路。Google digital library plan was rejected mightily from the day of its birth since 2004 and condemned both in speech and in writing throughout the network.Until The United States,France and China,they check evidences of both parties at court with it.The French judicial decisions and American judicial review both show that the implementation of the plan Infringes upon copyright enforcement.The copyright rule that first authorized then use become an insurmountable barrier to Google who put him in the framework of current copyright.The southern district of New York court circuit judges and the second circuit court of Appeals have both rejected Google book settlement agreement in 2011,making him back to the origin in journey of breaking copyright barrier.The reasons that the agreement was rejected include mainly representation of class action lawsuit plaintiff and monopoly use of Orphan works.Although Google book settlement agreement was rejected,its positive exploration makes copyright problem of digital library getting much attention,its solution of copyright will provide new ideas for Legislature to amend the copyright rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44