检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王军[1]
机构地区:[1]南京审计学院经济系
出 处:《国际金融研究》2011年第12期5-19,共15页Studies of International Finance
摘 要:本文对中国金融学学术期刊进行了回顾和评价。通过对国内五种金融学期刊评价指标的分析,我们得到两个结论:一是中国金融学期刊的整体水平逐年提升且进步明显;二是我国金融学期刊总体呈现出越来越规范的特点。这其中,匿名评审等规范化制度的引入对于改善期刊质量起到了关键的作用。我们还以《国际金融研究》杂志为例,对其历史演进做了归纳和总结并得出一些结论,这些结论支持了本文对我国金融学期刊做出的整体判断。通过对国外主要金融学期刊的介绍、对比和借鉴,本文还分析了我国金融期刊存在的不足之处,并给出若干改善期刊质量的建议。This paper examines the progress that the five leading Chinese finance journals have made over the past decades. We analyze the facts and characteristics of these journals with descriptive statistics, and find that these key journals have been greatly improved in terms of both quality and influence. We further inquire into the Studies of International Finance and conclude that there have been three profound changes taking place over the past years. Compared with the past, the Studies is now more open and more general-interest based. In addition, its focus has been turned from quantity to quality. Since most finance journals in China are facing similar problems and difficulties, we argue that the conclusions drawn from the Studies should be well applied to understand other Chinese finance journals and shed light on the improvement of other journals in China. The paper also outlines the major findings on the economic perception of the publication quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.104.28