检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周铸民[1] 丁桂聪[1] 陈晶[1] 宋宁[1] 石培荔[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市儿童医院口腔科,518026
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2011年第23期2843-2846,共4页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
基 金:深圳市科技计划非资助项目(200903098)
摘 要:目的观察复合树脂嵌体修复乳磨牙牙体缺损的临床效果。方法对乳磨牙牙体缺损分别采用复合树脂嵌体技术和复合树脂直接充填修复,复合树脂嵌体技术组99例,复合树脂直接充填修复104例;1年后复诊检查,评价标准采用改良USPHS评价标准。结果复合树脂嵌体技术组的临床成功率在固位情况(94.9%)、边缘密合度(92.9%)、继发龋(90.9%)、牙龈指数(92.9%)、牙髓反应(94.9%)、磨耗程度(88.9%)指标上高于复合树脂直接充填修复组,并且差异有显著性(P〈0.05)。在色泽协调性指标上,临床成功率(87.9%)虽高于复合树脂直接充填修复组,但统计学上差异无显著性(P〉0.05)。结论复合树脂嵌体修复术组临床效果优于复合树脂直接充填组。Objective To investigate the efficacy of composite resin inlay in the restoration of enamel defects in deciduous molars. Methods 203 deciduous molars with enamel defects were randomly assigned to receive composite resin inlay ( 99 molars, resin-inlay group ), or direct composite resin filling ( 104 molars, resin-filling group ). All the molars were examined one year after restoration; and the modified USPHS-criteria was used for assessment. Results The clinical success rate differed significantly between the resin-inlay group and the resin-filling group in retention, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, gingival index, reaction of the pulp, and abrasion level( 94.9%, 92.9%, 90.9%, 92.9%, 94.9%, and 88.9% in the former groul~ P〈 0.05 ). Although the clinical success rate of color match was higher in the group with resin-inlay ( 87.9% ) than in the group with resin-filling, but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Composite resin inlay is more efficacious than direct composite resin filling.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.85