自动红细胞沉降仪与经典魏氏法测定红细胞沉降率结果比较  

Evaluation of the comparison between automated analyzer and classical Weishi methods in detecting ESR

作　　者：李若倩[1] 丁爽[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省徐州医学院附属医院检验科,221002

出　　处：《检验医学与临床》2011年第23期2856-2857,共2页Laboratory Medicine and Clinic

摘　　要：目的应用两种不同型号的自动红细胞沉降仪(DRAGONMEN2010,DR-2010和MONITOR-20,MO-20)与经典的魏氏法同时测定红细胞沉降率(ESR),评价DR-2010和MO-20自动红细胞沉降仪测定ESR的可靠性和稳定性。方法随机抽取门诊104例患者,抽取患者静脉血分别注入3种红细胞沉降真空试管内,应用DR-2010和MO-20红细胞沉降仪与经典的魏氏法同时测定ESR,并对数据进行统计学分析与比较。结果 DR-2010和MO-20自动红细胞沉降仪检测ESR的结果分别为(28.03±27.59)mm/h和(27.70±29.52)mm/h,与经典魏氏法[(32.25±30.06)mm/h]相比较,结果差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),相关性较好。结论自动红细胞沉降仪检测时间短,时间、温度、湿度自动补偿修正,影响因素较少,能够更好地满足临床与患者的需要。Objective To apply two different types of automated erythrocyte sedimentation rate（ESR） analyzer（DRAGONMEN2010 and MONITOR-20） with the classical Weishi method for simultaneous measurement of ESR,and to evaluate the reliability and stability of automated ESR analyzer.Methods 104 outpatients were selected randomly and detected ESR with automatic ESR analyzer（DR-2010 and MO-20） and traditional Weishi method,and the data were statistically analyzed and compared.Results There was no significant difference between the results of DR-2010,MO-20 and Weishi method（P0.05）,and there had a good correlation.Conclusion Automatic ESR analyzer needs shorter period to detect ESR,and time,temperature as well as humidity can be corrected automatically.Besides,it has less influence factors,so it meets the needs of clinical treatment and patients,and should be widely promoted in clinical practice.

关 键 词：自动红细胞沉降仪 魏氏法 红细胞沉降率 

分 类 号：R446.11[医药卫生—诊断学]